Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µðÁöÅÐ ¿µ»ó ½Ã½ºÅÛÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¾Ë·ç¹Ì´½ ´ç·®È­»ó¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ñ·® ÃøÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A study on assessment of bone mass from aluminum-equivalent image by digital imaging system

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 1996³â 20±Ç 2È£ p.175 ~ 187
±èÁø¼ö, ÃÖÀÇȯ, ±èÀç´ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁø¼ö (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
ÃÖÀÇȯ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
±èÀç´ö (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to evaluate the method for quantitative assessment of
bone mass from aluminum-equivalent value of hydroxyapatite by using digital imaging system consisted of Power Macintosh 7200/120, 15-inch color monitor, and GT-9000 scanner with transparency unit.
After aluminum-equivalent image made from correlation between aluminum thickness and grey scale, the accuracy of conversion to mass from aluminum-equivalent value was evaluated. Measured bone mass was compared with converted bone mass from aluminum-equivalent value of hydroxyapatite block by correlation formula between aluminum-equivalent value of hydroxyapatite block and hydroxyapatite mass.
The results of this study were as follow;
1. Correlation between aluminum thickness and grey level for obtaining aluminum-equivalent image was high positively associated(r2=0.99). Converted masses from aluminum-equivalent value were very similar to measured masses. There was, statistically, no significant difference(P<0.05) between them.
2. Correlation between hydroxyapatite aluminum-equivalent and hydroxyapatite mass was shown to linear relation(rz=0.95).
3. Converted masses from aluminum-equivalent value of 3 dry mandible segments were similar to measured masses. The difference between the exposure directions was not significantly different(P<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI